He holds a Master's degree in Law from Hunan University and is an outstanding lawyer in Changsha. He currently serves as the Executive Director of the Criminal Law Professional Committee of Zhonglun W&D, the Executive Director of Beijing Zhonglun W&D (Changsha) Law Firm, the Executive Director of the Case Research Center of the Law School of Central South University, a visiting professor at the Law School of Hunan University of Technology and Business, a practical mentor for Master's degree students in law, the honorary president of the Henan Chamber of Commerce in Hunan Province, an executive member of the Hunan Provincial Federation of Industry and Commerce, the vice president of the Hunan Alumni Association of Northwest University of Political Science and Law, and a director of the Litigation Law Research Association of the Hunan Provincial Law Society.

Specializing in corporate legal services, criminal defense, and criminal legal risk prevention and control, I have provided legal services to multiple government agencies, state-owned enterprises, listed companies, and private enterprises, handling nearly a hundred criminal cases of various types.

Working Experience

• 2008-2010：Attorney, Hunan Tongcheng Law Firm,  
• 2010-2016：Partner, Beijing Zhongyin (Changsha) Law Firm, 
• 2016-2021：Partner, Hunan Gaozhe Law Firm,  
• 2021-Present：Partner, Beijing Zhonglun W&D (Changsha) Law Firm,

Achievements

• W was suspected of theft. Intervened during the investigation stage, but no arrest was approved. Later, the procuratorate made a decision of non-prosecution due to doubts.
• N was suspected of organizing the crime of illegally crossing the national border (frontier). Intervention was made during the investigation stage, and ultimately, the public security organ withdrew the case and converted it to an administrative penalty.
• H was suspected of defrauding 46 million yuan in export tax rebates. During the examination and approval of arrest, timely communication was made and a legal opinion was submitted, leading to the procuratorate's decision not to approve the arrest. The people's court sentenced him to probation.
• In the case of X participating in a criminal organization, the case was intervened at the examination and prosecution stage. The public security organ's opinion on prosecution accused Xia X of 10 charges. After defense, the procuratorate adjusted the charges to 7. At the trial stage, the court found X guilty of 5 charges, significantly reducing the sentencing range and achieving good defense results.
• L was suspected of privately dividing state-owned assets and deliberately destroying accounting vouchers. This case is part of the XX power grid series of cases. He was sentenced to one year and five months in prison for the two crimes.
• G was suspected of fraud and concealing criminal proceeds. Intervention was made during the investigation stage, and the compulsory measures were changed after arrest. During the review and prosecution stage, the fraud charge was dropped, and the procuratorial organ did not provide sentencing recommendations. After the first-instance trial, the social assessment investigation failed, and a suspended sentence was ultimately imposed.
• In the case of G suspected of concealing and withholding criminal proceeds, intervention was made during the investigation stage, and the suspect was released on bail pending trial. Later, the procuratorate made a decision of non-prosecution due to doubts.
• In the case of Z suspected of the crime of harboring prostitution, I intervened at the second instance stage and successfully reduced the sentence.
• L was suspected of committing the crime of major liability accident. During the examination and prosecution stage, the charge was changed and a suspended sentence was imposed.
• Z was suspected of the crime of causing an accident involving dangerous goods, but was not prosecuted.
• In the case of J's illegal absorption of public deposits, the case involved relevant behaviors in the issuance process of the national welfare lottery, with a total amount of over 800 million yuan. Later, Jiang was not prosecuted by the procuratorial organ.
• A commercial company was suspected of selling counterfeit and inferior products. The provincial department supervised the case, and lawyers intervened before the case was filed. However, no arrest was approved, and the district procuratorate issued a decision of non-prosecution.
• In the case of a certain company falsely issuing VAT special invoices, we intervened during the investigation stage. The legal representative was released on bail pending trial, and later the public security organ withdrew the case.
• A fraud case (fraudulent subsidy and gang-related) involving a bus group was supervised by the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection. The amount involved in the case was significantly reduced, and the punishment was downgraded.

LL.B. in Law, Hunan University

PRC Lawyer’s Practicing Qualification

Chinese