1.
In the case of Mr. Y suspected of causing death by negligence, he did not
prosecute after being released on bail;
2.
In the case of Mr. L suspected of embezzlement, after being arrested by the procuratorate,
the necessity of detention was reviewed and ultimately not prosecuted;
3.
In the case of Mr. L's suspected bribery, he did not prosecute after being
released on bail;
4.
In the case of Mr. C suspected of gathering a crowd to fight, he did not
prosecute after being released on bail;
5.
In the case of Mr. Z suspected of torture and forced confession, he was not
prosecuted;
6.
In the case of Mr. Z suspected of causing an accident of dangerous goods, he
was not arrested by the procuratorate and eventually did not prosecute;
7.
In the case of Mr. L suspected of issuing a false VAT special invoice, he was
released on bail and finally terminated the investigation.
8.
In the case of Ms. T suspected of fraud, after she was released on bail, the
lawyer's defense opinion that it should be classified as contract fraud was
adopted by the first instance court, and the sentence changed from more than
ten years to five and a half years;
9.
In the case of Mr. Y suspected of opening a casino, after he was released on
bail, his lawyer proposed that the crime should be classified as aiding
information network criminal activities, which was adopted by the court and the
sentence was changed from less than ten years to probation;
10.
In the case of Mr. Z suspected of fraud, the first instance sentenced to ten
years and two months in prison. The lawyer intervened in the second instance.
The court ruled to send it back for retrial, changing the case as a crime of
obstructing credit card management, and sentenced to one year and nine months
in prison;
11.
In the case of Mr. H's suspected bribery, the sentence was reduced by one year
on the original basis;
12.
In the case of Mr. H suspected of organizing prostitution, the lawyer
intervened in the second instance, and the court ruled to send it back for
retrial;
13.
In the case of Mr. T suspected of major liability accident, he was sentenced to
two years in prison in the first instance. The lawyer intervened in the second
instance. After he was released on bail, the first instance was changed to
probation;
14.
In the case of Ms. Z suspected of producing and selling counterfeit products,
the lawyer's defense opinions were adopted by the first instance court. Her
sentence changed from more than seven years to one or two months, and she was
released after the judgment;
15.
In the case of Mr. L's suspected of opening a casino, he was sentenced to
probation in the first instance after being released on bail;
16.
In the case of Mr. W suspected of operating a gambling den, he was not detained,
and the court reduced the identified illicit proceeds by 150,000 yuan,
sentencing him to probation in the first instance.
17.
In the case of Mr. L suspected of a major safety accident in engineering, after
being granted bail, his lawyer changed the nature of the case, and he was
sentenced to probation in the first instance.
18.
In the case of Mr. Q suspected of drug trafficking, his sentence was reduced by
three months based on the sentencing recommendation, and he was released
immediately after the verdict.
19.
In the case of Mr. C suspected of illegally absorbing public deposits, he was
not detained, the court reduced the identified illicit proceeds by 70,000 yuan,
and based on the sentencing recommendation, his sentence was reduced by three
months, with a fine reduction of 40,000 yuan; he was released immediately after
the verdict.
20.
In the case of Mr. P suspected of operating a gambling den, after being granted
bail, his sentence was reduced by three months based on the sentencing recommendation,
with a fine reduction of 20,000 yuan.
21.
In the case of Mr. S suspected of embezzlement, after he was not detained, he
was sentenced to probation in the first instance.
22.
In the case of Mr. X suspected of obstructing the prevention and control of
infectious diseases, after he was detained, the necessity review for detention
was passed.
23.
In the case of Mr. H suspected of being responsible for a major accident, He
was released on bail.
24.
In the case of Mr. C suspected of issuing false VAT invoices, He was released
on bail.
25.
Mr. L caused slight injury to another person; he was summoned by the police,
and after the lawyer's intervention, the police did not file a criminal case.
